By MIKE MAGEE
Stanford neuroscientist, David Eagleman, reminded us this week that “A coherent clarification of consciousness eludes trendy science.” That was his opening line within the New York Times book review of Michael Pollan’s newest effort, “A World Appears.” In it, Pollan asks innocently, “How does the mind generate a unified sense of self?”
In keeping with Eagleman, “Pollan is just not in a position to furnish the solutions (nobody can, but), however he presents a fascinating exploration, one that’s extremely private and delicate.” On this, he’s not alone. Different fields are engaged in the identical pursuit.
To start with, there are the epigeneticists. They research “how the environment influences our genes by altering the chemical compounds hooked up to them.” Within the arms of those scientists, genes are usually not “set in stone and (absolutely) predetermined.” Of late, these investigators have been unraveling how varied chemical compounds, engaged on the floor and inside cells are always altering and adjusting how our genes work. Thus the title, since “epi” is Greek for “over, exterior of, round.”
Different investigators like Professor Eddy Keming Chen within the division of Philosophy at College of California San Diego come on the drawback from a special route. She bolstered her PhD in Philosophy with a Masters in Mathematical Physics, and a graduate certificates in Cognitive Science. She teaches the PHIL 130 course on Metaphysics.
Within the UCSD college syllabus, she tees up the query, “Why research metaphysics?” She guarantees enrollees that in the event that they enroll, they’ll discover a little bit of magic in exploring powerful questions, like: “Do we now have free will? Is it suitable with causal determinism? What’s the place of the thoughts and of the consciousness in a bodily world?”
Within the Jesuit world that I got here from, such programs had been obligatory as a part of the core curriculum. In my very own alma mater, they now not carry the identical mandate, however nonetheless stay alive and nicely.
Take into account, for instance PHL 365 – a 3 credit score course at LeMoyne Faculty titled Philosophy of Mind. As soon as once more, there may be magic within the air for inquiring minds.
Here’s a description. “The principle focus of the course would be the ‘mind-body drawback’: can the existence of minds and psychological states be reconciled with a totally materialistic or bodily view of the world? A second, carefully related focus shall be: can psychological states be applied on a pc?”
Lastly, if neither of those fields captures your creativeness, you would observe the lead of Dr. Marie Duhamel, a member of the Board of Administrators of the French Society of Proteomics, and analysis immunologist on the College of Lille. Her 2025 publication in Frontiers in Immunology, titled “Self or non self: end of a dogma?” is an epic exploration of the historic foundations of immunology, and begins this fashion, “The query of what constitutes the ‘self’ and the way residing organisms preserve their integrity towards exterior threats has preoccupied thinkers from numerous fields, together with philosophy, biology and medication, for hundreds of years.”
Reviewing greater than a century of analysis that started with the beginning of Immunology as a self-discipline, Dr. Duhamel and her co-author Professor Michel Salzet, are compelled to acknowledge that prior assumptions weren’t solely incorrect however characterize solely a portion of the reality. Of their phrases, “Conceptually, all the premise that the immune system’s first job is to outline what’s self in order to not assault it’s contradicted once we take into account microchimerism and being pregnant tolerance, instances during which really international (paternally derived) tissues persist with out triggering rejection. Equally, the truth that the human microbiome might be very important to regular operate challenges the idea that foreignness inevitably triggers aggression.”
The place then does the reality lie? In keeping with the authors, “The function of the immune system is to handle complicated ecological relationships by distinguishing helpful or impartial international entities from dangerous ones. The presence of ‘innocent international’ components is a mainstay within the intestine, pores and skin, and oropharynx. Furthermore, the combination of viruses into the genome, generally with evolutionary and developmental advantages, blurs the boundary between self and international in a basic, genomic sense. Endogenous retroviral components represent a good portion of human DNA, but no strong immune aggression is mounted towards these deeply embedded viral sequences. This phenomenon invitations researchers to conceive of ‘self’ as together with sure classes of international genetic materials which have turn out to be symbiotic or impartial over evolutionary time.”
Earlier than they end, the scientists humble themselves by permitting boundaries to blur as they transfer freely into philosophic uncharted territory. The “magic “ is in full view, as they proceed: “These ideas are in line with the up to date philosophy of immunology, which contains ecological and developmental insights, such because the statement that commensal microbes, fetal cells within the maternal circulation, or latent viruses are usually not robotically rejected as “non-self,” however as a substitute coexist with the host beneath particular regulatory circumstances.
No matter which street you journey, a standard vacation spot is starting to look on the horizon. The convergence of disciplines – Metaphysics, Immunology, Epigenetics – is now not aggressive however somewhat complimentary. The remaining query: Are we as a species prepared for this? Can we deal with the reality?
Michael Pollan clearly thinks we’re. His web site asks the reader to journey “the chopping fringe of the sphere, the place scientists are entertaining extra radical (and fewer materialist) theories of consciousness. A World Appears introduces us to “plant neurobiologists” trying to find the primary flicker of consciousness in crops; scientists striving to engineer emotions into AI, and psychologists and novelists searching for to seize the felt expertise of our slippery stream of consciousness.”
The epigeneticists are cautiously optimistic. Of their phrases, “There’s rather a lot we don’t know. However meaning there’s a lot left to find.” However for the immunologists, with the promise of latest remedies for most cancers and ageing, it’s full pace forward. Their remaining phrases, “If this implies embracing the ‘finish of a dogma,’ it additionally heralds the daybreak of a extra integrative immunological science.’ “
Mike Magee MD is a Medical Historian and common contributor to THCB. He’s the writer of CODE BLUE: Inside America’s Medical Industrial Complex. (Grove/2020)
